The slightly good news? It was out of in each of the previous two years. Finance Vertical Hit Hard 14 of the top 20 iOS financial apps and 19 of the top 20 Android financial apps were hacked last year. Facebook and Google, which have 8 apps out of the top 10, are enough for most people. Today, the majority of app users access 20 or fewer apps per month, and their number one most-used app accounts for half of all their time spent using apps.
Their top 10 most-used apps account for nearly all the time they spend in apps. These digital health pioneers have been pushing market developments and have professionalized the digital health market on multiple levels: in terms of revenue models, technical sophistication and early-stage financing.
The top three most attractive revenue models are licensing e. These complex apps have an above-average development time, have a higher percentage of tools and SDK integrated, a higher rate of EHR electronic health record integration and are offering APIs for others to access apps health data.
And seems to be a record-breaking year. Apart from the sheer money flow into the eco-system, investors are adjusting their offerings to the very specific conditions in the digital health industry with its regulations and long product development cycles. Developing a successful mobile health app is becoming harder and harder. Come on over and take a look at my Absolute Horror and Dramatisation Of Life lists to see where I've ranked the skinny one.
Basically the film is set it to time lines, before and after and you know at some point they will converge but your never entirety sure until Strange film because of the 2 time lines, one a love story and the other a fight for survival, but the love story story for me was far from realistic but in the context of the underlying message carried by both story lines both acted as a way to get this message across.
In out lives we may have to face our own monsters, real or events which we may not want to face but we know we have to do so, this film with the 2 story lines uses both real monsters and the monsters we may have to face in real life and joins then up in a way which made for a rather enjoyable watch.
Rating 7 out of This movie fails on each level and with every its element other than the creature effects. Ok, here we go. Even though there are not as many actors in this movie, all of them besides the husband are horrible. The lead is the worst. Her facial expressions are so fake and confusing. It makes you laugh when you see just how much she tries and fails, everything from her voice to her facial expressions is terrible, her body language is a mess as well.
She's also distractingly pretty and in no way believable as a character. She's too beautiful for a post-apocalypse scenario as well as for a drug addict with a broken life one. I thought that she is in the film because she is in a relationship with the director or the producer, this is not uncommon these days, but I have found no proof to back this up. The supporting cast besides the husband was probably just the people from the production crew, there's not a lot of them, but they all overact like crazy the doctor lady, the old man buying drugs and the others.
The dialogue was atrocious. I guess I should give some credit to actors trying to act while saying such nonsense after all.
I think the idea was to sort of form a dynamic genuine love relationship since French directors love to mix up love, sex, and violence. But yet again, this failed. Character-wise the lead gives you no reason to root or care for her whatsoever. At times she's saucy and aggressive for no reason, probably to indicate drug addiction or mental issues. Sometimes she's tough and acts like a Rambo, other times she's weak and defensive.
Her arc is vague and is probably meant to indicate that she finally opened herself to others. Yet I'm not sure about that. The husband character is a stereotype of how insecure single women in their 40ties imagine a perfect man. Single, handsome, educated, rich yet always has free time, caring, selfless, and always understanding - no bad traits or drawbacks.
His motivation is mostly sex, and he's quite dull. He has a couple of pretentious lines about how hard it was for him to cope with becoming rich or something, not particularly interesting either.
The story is a mess with as many holes there are in a cheese grater. They attempt at using two parallel timelines and storylines that go side by side. In both of these, the lead is hostile towards the husband, who for no reason besides sex in the first story cares for her and tries to help her. This substantiates the idea of true love that has no limits. Besides the fact that the ending was utterly improbable, they still failed with the message as well.
This is quite literal "love till the end of the world" and after that story built on nothing. They had zero chemistry together, the lead most of the time just acted like an attention-hungry wench while the husband was unreasonably caring while being driven by sex which makes his character pretty sexist.
The child losing scene was so badly acted and misdirected it makes you wonder why would they even go for such intense scenes with such horrible writing and directing. I would probably give the film some credit for the ending scene, but I've already seen a similar story that was done better. REC 3 Genesis was a funny little B-movie with the same ending message done a million times better. The foreshadowing in this is just kindergarten level. Look closer to see the man behind the monster, pictures of hands, Jesus Christ.
I guess I should address a couple of holes in this. Well, we don't know anything about the world ending event other than a gas attack in the middle of the city. However, the lead doesn't seem to age at all, so I assume that the world died and turned into a desert quite fast.
There's also no indication of survival on her. They also mix USA-type gas station with obvious French trucks which just makes it even more confusing.
The creatures are probably resurrected or heavily mutated people, as indicated by the ending. Or if not, the conclusion starts to make even less sense. Their capabilities are unknown. Sometimes the lead can quickly kill them in a melee fight in a trailer, other times she can't, and the bullets and explosions don't seem to hurt them anymore. The armored car she drives in has metal grates that can easily be removed with bare hands.
The's a survivor, but she doesn't know how to use a beacon. The handling of her broken leg was incredibly unrealistic. The creature's intentions were purposely made unclear to ensure the twist since it's obviously aggressive at first.
They are sometimes slow, sometimes fast, sometimes strong, sometimes weak. They seem to be blind, but the light hurts them. They are attracted by sound and can teleport. Loved the dialogue when they bait her into activating the beacon only to tell her they are not coming for her, and she verbally assaults the only person that can save her life now :D I mean, I would not want to go back for her either.
Overall, I enjoyed the creature make-up even though it was a complete rip-off from the Fallout game series Feral Ghouls. Opening shots were kinda cool and Hostile is a bad movie, and I didn't like it. As a film standing on its own, this one felt to me to be largely strong enough to be something that would be in theaters, make a slight profit, then largely disappear.
The setup is simple and one which provides a lot of leeway in terms of storytelling and minimizing the budget, with a woman in the post-apocalypse trapped with a broken leg under her overturned jeep as night falls and horrible night-time monster zombies are circling it, trying to drag her out, with only the bright lights of the car and a pistol to hold them off.
A significant portion of the film is dedicated to flashbacks, essentially telling her story before the apocalypse event, her relationship with a French guy, her own troubles and their relationship and so on.
Metaphors and alliterations were probably made all throughout which would require a second viewing to fully appreciate, but the movie sees fit to cram the most obvious one right in front of our eyes, once at the start and once near the end, about seeing beauty in ugliness and such. It's all mostly competently done, if not particularly exhilarating in any real way.
However, a lot of the dramatic events in the flashbacks which were clearly intended to be taken seriously end up feeling at best hammy, and at worst laughable. The ultimate laugh happens at the end, however. It is so over the top with what it thinks is a spectacularly meaningful and resonant revelation that it is laugh out loud funny. Yet it's funny in a way that is not worthy of scorn or ridicule, it's more the sort of laughter that comes from something that was clearly meant to be serious and heartfelt while straining too much credulity and just not feeling deserved or "earned".
It feels like an honest and earnest attempt at something emotional that you almost feel guilty for laughing and feel sorry for the filmmaker or taking the chance he did. Just watched this nonsense on SKY and its awful. Drawn out bore fest, no need for the constant flash backs. The Creature that looks like a malnourished human with one stomp totally smashes an humans head hahaa give us a break seriously. Low budget B movies from the 70s come to mind however this movie is trying to be serious.
SilverOrlov 6 April The whole story, all the emotional component of the plot are in the memories of the heroine. All that is not in the past is just a little bit of a jeep ride, and a couple of more or less tolerable moments justifying the title of the movie about post-apocalypse. The only exception is the very end of the film. And that, with a stupid, in my opinion, the end.
This is a drama. There are other elements, but this is a drama. That said, everything is well executed. This movie was different but no reason for the hostile alien things. What happened to cause the apocalypse how the alien beings came to be.
Lots of unanswered questions n the ending was strange. A relatively simple film but acted decently. Still it was basically a tale of tragic love with five percent horror thrown in. BillBayard 21 November This is obviously low budget and it shows. It's pretty much a two person movie and Brittany Ashworth in the lead is not a good enough actress to pull this all off.
0コメント